Stakeholder

Stakeholder

Strategic management: A stakeholder approach

RE Freeman - 2010 - books.google.com

Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach was first published in 1984 as a part of the
Pitman series in Business and Public Policy. Its publication proved to be a landmark moment
in the development of stakeholder theory. Widely acknowledged as a world leader in
business ethics and strategic management, R. Edward Freeman's foundational work
continues to inspire scholars and students concerned with a more practical view of how
business and capitalism actually work. Business can be understood as a system of how we 

Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems

F Perrini, A Tencati - Business Strategy and the Environment, 2006 - Wiley Online Library

Corporate sustainability, that is the capacity of a firm to continue operating over a long
period of time, depends on the sustainability of its stakeholder relationships. This new
stakeholder view of the firm goes beyond previous work on the triple bottom line and
balanced scorecard. Companies need appropriate systems to measure and control their
own behaviour in order to assess whether they are responding to stakeholder concerns in
an effective way and to communicate the results achieved. These sustainability accounting …

The stakeholder theory and the common good

A Argandoña - Journal of business ethics, 1998 - Springer

The theory of the social responsibility of the firm oscillates between two extremes: one that
reduces the firm's responsibility to the obtainment of (the greatest possible) profit for its
shareholders, and another that extends the firm's responsibility to include a wide range of
actors with an interest or" stake" in the firm. The stakeholder theory of the social
responsibility of business is more appealing from an ethical point of view, and yet it lacks a
solid foundation that would be acceptable to a variety of schools of thought. In this paper I 

1. Boatright, J. R.: 1994, ‘Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, What's So Special About Shareholders?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
2. Brenner, S. N. and P. Cochran: 1990, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’, Working Paper MGMT 90–1 (Portland State University, Portland, Oregon).Google Scholar
3. Brenner, S. N. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Practice’, Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society(Sundance, Utah).Google Scholar
4. Burton, B. K. and C. P. Dunn: 1996, ‘Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2) (April).Google Scholar
5. Calvez, Y. and J. Perrin: 1959, Eglise et société économique(Paris).Google Scholar
6. Carroll, A.: 1989, Business and Society(South Western, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
7. Carson, T. L.: 1993, ‘Does the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(2) (April).Google Scholar
8. Donaldson, T.: 1989, The Ethics of International Business(Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
9. Dunn, C.: 1990, ‘The Stakeholder Approach as Ethical Theory: A Critical Review’, paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting.Google Scholar
10. Dunn, C. and N. Brady: 1995, ‘From Rules to Relationships: A Review of the Search for an Ethical Justification of Stakeholder Interests’, Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society.Google Scholar
11. Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1993, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. Beauchamp and N Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, 4th. ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
12. Finnis, J.: 1983, Fundamentals of Ethics(Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
13. Follett, M. P.: 1996, Prophet of Management(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
14. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach(Pitman Press, Boston).Google Scholar
15. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Shareholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
16. Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
17. Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert: 1992, ‘Business Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda’, Business & Society 31(1).Google Scholar
18. Freeman, R. E. and D. L. Reed: 1983, ‘Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance’, California Management Review 25(Spring).Google Scholar
19. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine(September 13th).Google Scholar
20. Goodpaster, K. E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1) (January).Google Scholar
21. Goodpaster, K. E. and T. E. Holloran: 1994, ‘In Defense of a Paradox’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
22. Hosseini, J. C. and S. N. Brenner: 1992, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2) (April).Google Scholar
23. Langtry, B.: 1994, ‘Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibility of Business’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
24. Maitland, I.: 1994, ‘The Morality of the Corporation: An Empirical or Normative Disagreement?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
25. Maritain, J.: 1966a, The Person and the Common Good(University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame).Google Scholar
26. Maritain, J.: 1966b, Humanismo integral(Lohlé, Buenos Aires).Google Scholar
27. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1968, Persona humana y justicia social(Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
28. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1971, ‘Bien comÚn’, en Gran Enciclopedia Rialp, vol. IV (Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
29. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1974, Economía y Libertad(Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro, Madrid).Google Scholar
30. Mitroff, I. I.: 1983, Stakeholders of the Organization Mind(Jossey Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
31. Parker, P.: 1996, ‘Most Quoted - Least Heeded: The Five Senses of Follett’, in M. P. Follett (1996).Google Scholar
32. Phillips, R. A.: 1997, ‘Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1) (January).Google Scholar
33. Ramírez, S. M.: s.f., La doctrina política de Santo Tomás(CSIC, Madrid).Google Scholar
34. Schlossberger, E.: 1994, ‘A New Model of Business: Dual-Investor Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
35. Second Vatican Council: 1965, ‘Gaudium et spes’, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58, 1966.Google Scholar
36. Todolí, J.: s.f., El bien comÚn(Madrid).Google Scholar
37. Velásquez, M.: 1992, ‘International Business, Morality, and the Coommon Good’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(1) (January).Google Scholar
38. Wallace, W. A.: 1977, The Elements of Philosophy.A Compendium for Philosophers and Theologians(Alba House, New York).Google Scholar
39. Wicks, A. C., D. R. Gilbert and R. E. Freeman: 1994, ‘A Feminist Reinterpretion of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
40. Yepes, R.: 1996, Fundamentos de Antropología. Un ideal de la excelencia humana(Eunsa, Pamplona).Google Scholar
    
    
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1006075517423 
    
    

    The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate

    HJ Smith - MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003 - sloanreview.mit.edu

    Vol. 44, No. 4 Reprint# 44411 http://mitsmr. com/1g2ZmLj he stakeholder theorists smell
    blood. Scandals at Enron, Global Crossing, ImClone, Tyco International and WorldCom,
    concerns about the independence of accountants who are charged with auditing financial
    statements, and questions about the incentive schema and investor recommendations at
    Credit Suisse First Boston and Merrill Lynch have all provided rich fodder for those who
    question the premise of shareholder supremacy. Many observers have claimed that these 

    
    

    Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions

    S Miles - Journal of Business Ethics, 2017 - Springer

    Stakeholder theory is widely accepted but elementary aspects remain indeterminate as the
    term 'stakeholder'is an essentially contested concept (Miles, J Bus Ethics 108: 285–298,
    2012; Mitchell, Organ Stud 33: 1407–1411, 2012), being variously describable, internally
    complex and open in character (Gallie, Proc Aristot Soc 56: 167–198, 1956). Such
    contestability is highly problematic for theory development and empirical testing. The extent
    of essential contestability, previously unknown, is demonstrated in this paper through a 

    
    

    Capturing the stakeholders' view in sustainability reporting: a novel approach

    N Bellantuono, P Pontrandolfo, B Scozzi - Sustainability, 2016 - mdpi.com

    Sustainability reporting is the process by which companies describe how they deal with their
    own economic, environmental, and social impacts, thus making stakeholders able to
    recognize the value of sustainable practices. As stressed in the Global Reporting Initiative
    guidelines, which act as a de facto standard for sustainability reporting, sustainable reports
    should take into account the stakeholders' view. In particular, engaging stakeholders is
    essential to carry out the materiality analysis, by which organizations can identify their own 

    Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice

    F Ackermann, C Eden - Long range planning, 2011 - Elsevier

    This article explores how top management teams can increase the robustness of their
    strategies by attending to important concepts emerging from the stakeholder literature.
    Analysis of three themes emanating from this literature leads to the development of a
    method composed of three techniques which elaborates how stakeholder management
    concepts can be applied in practice. The research, which spanned a 15 year time period,
    was based on working with 16 top management teams while they were developing their …

    Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management: Cincinnati

    AB Carroll, AK Buchholtz - OH: South-Western College Publishing, 2000

    Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity

    S Lux, TR Crook, DJ Woehr - Journal of management, 2011 - journals.sagepub.com

    Corporate political activity (CPA) has increased rapidly in the United States; however,
    research findings are spread across several social science fields. The authors use meta-
    analysis to aggregate findings involving two sets of research questions:(1) what factors and
    to what extent do these factors influence firms to engage in CPA, and (2) does CPA, in turn,
    affect firm performance and, if so, to what extent? Two important contributions are made.
    First, the evidence suggests that, although many factors shape CPA, very few affect CPA to a …

    Corporate social responsibility and company performance

    YB Adeneye, M Ahmed - Journal of Business Studies …, 2015 - pdfs.semanticscholar.org

    The study examined the impact of corporate social responsibility on company performance.
    A descriptive research design was adopted. Corporate social responsibility was measured
    using CSR index. Company performance was measured using market to book value (MBV),
    company size (Size), and return on capital employed (ROCE). Descriptive statistics,
    regression and correlation analysis were carried out. Descriptive statistics were done to
    describe the data set of 500UK firms, regression statistics and correlation analyses were 

    Stakeholders: Theory and practice

    AL Friedman, S Miles - 2006 - Oxford University Press on Demand

    Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts

    RK Mitchell, BR Agle, DJ Wood - Academy of management review, 1997 - journals.aom.org

    Stakeholder theory has been a popular heuristic for describing the management
    environment for years, but it has not attained full theoretical status. Our aim in this article is to
    contribute to a theory of stakeholder identification and salience based on stakeholders
    possessing one or more of three relationship attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. By
    combining these attributes, we generate a typology of stakeholders, propositions concerning
    their salience to managers of the firm, and research and management implications.

    The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications

    T Donaldson, LE Preston - Academy of management Review, 1995 - journals.aom.org

    The stakeholder theory has been advanced and justified in the management literature on
    the basis of its descriptive accuracy, instrumental power, and normative validity. These three
    aspects of the theory, although interrelated, are quite distinct; they involve different types of
    evidence and argument and have different implications. In this article, we examine these
    three aspects of the theory and critique and integrate important contributions to the literature
    related to each. We conclude that the three aspects of stakeholder theory are mutually …

    Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance

    RE Freeman, DL Reed - California management review, 1983 - journals.sagepub.com

    The purpose of this article is to show how the concept of stakeholders in an organization can
    be used to understand the tasks of the board of directors. The authors argue that a
    volunteeristic approach to questions of corporate governance which focuses on effective
    director behavior is preferable to structural change via legislation.