Evolution of empathetic moral evaluation

1. Arunas L Radzvilavicius  ,
2. Alexander J Stewart,
3. Joshua B Plotkin 

1. University of Pennsylvania, United States;
2. University of Houston, United States

Research Article Apr 9, 2019

Social norms can promote cooperation by assigning reputations to individuals based on their past actions. A good reputation indicates that an individual is likely to reciprocate. A large body of research has established norms of moral assessment that promote cooperation, assuming reputations are objective. But without a centralized institution to provide objective evaluation, opinions about an individual’s reputation may differ across a population. In this setting we study the role of empathy–the capacity to form moral evaluations from another person’s perspective. We show that empathy tends to foster cooperation by reducing the rate of unjustified defection. The norms of moral evaluation previously considered most socially beneficial depend on high levels of empathy, whereas different norms maximize social welfare in populations incapable of empathy. Finally, we show that empathy itself can evolve through social contagion. We conclude that a capacity for empathy is a key component for sustaining cooperation in societies.

-

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44269.001

 

• https://elifesciences.org/articles/44269

  
  

  Referencias:

1. Why act for the public good? four answers
   

   1. CD Batson

   (1994)
   

   Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20:603–610.

   https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205016
   

   • Google Scholar
2. Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict
   

   1. CD Batson
   2. TR Klein
   3. L Highberger
   4. LL Shaw

   (1995)
   

   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:1042–1054.

   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1042
   

   • Google Scholar
3. Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging?
   

   1. CD Batson
   2. K Sager
   3. E Garst
   4. M Kang

   (1997)
   

   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:495–509.

   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495
   

   • Google Scholar
4. Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma
   

   1. CD Batson
   2. T Moran

   (1999)
   

   European Journal of Social Psychology 29:909–924.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7<909::AID-EJSP965>3.0.CO;2-L
   

   • Google Scholar
5. The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement
   

   1. JW Buckholtz
   2. R Marois

   (2012)
   

   Nature Neuroscience 15:655–661.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3087
   

   • Google Scholar
6. Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness
   

   1. RB Cialdini
   2. SL Brown
   3. BP Lewis
   4. C Luce
   5. SL Neuberg

   (1997)
   

   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:481–494.

   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
   

   • Google Scholar
7. Their pain gives Us pleasure: how intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses
   

   1. M Cikara
   2. E Bruneau
   3. JJ Van Bavel
   4. R Saxe

   (2014)
   

   Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55:110–125.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
   

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. Moral learning: psychological and philosophical perspectives
   

   1. F Cushman
   2. V Kumar
   3. P Railton

   (2017)
   

   Cognition 167:1–10.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008
   

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach
   

   1. MH Davis

   (1983)
   

   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44:113–126.

   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   

   • Google Scholar
10. Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy
    

    1. FB de Waal

    (2008)
    

    Annual Review of Psychology 59:279–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species
    

    1. J Decety
    2. IB-A Bartal
    3. F Uzefovsky
    4. A Knafo-Noam

    (2016)
    

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:20150077.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077
    

    • Google Scholar
12. Empathy: conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior
    

    1. N Eisenberg
    2. RA Fabes

    (1990)
    

    Motivation and Emotion 14:131–149.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991640
    

    • Google Scholar
13. Empathy, perspective taking and prosocial behaviour: the importance of parenting practices
    

    1. BM Farrant
    2. TAJ Devine
    3. MT Maybery
    4. J Fletcher

    (2012)
    

    Infant and Child Development 21:175–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.740
    

    • Google Scholar
14. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree
    

    1. SAH Geritz
    2. É. Kisdi
    3. G Meszéna
    4. JAJ Metz

    (1998)
    

    Evolutionary Ecology 12:35–57.

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554906681
    

    • Google Scholar
15. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans
    

    1. H Gintis
    2. S Bowles
    3. R Boyd
    4. E Fehr

    (2003)
    

    Evolution and Human Behavior 24:153–172.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00157-5
    

    • Google Scholar
16. Emotional contagion
    

    1. E Hatfield
    2. JT Cacioppo
    3. RL Rapson

    (1993)
    

    Current Directions in Psychological Science 2:96–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
    

    • Google Scholar
17. Indirect reciprocity with private, noisy, and incomplete information
    

    1. C Hilbe
    2. L Schmid
    3. J Tkadlec
    4. K Chatterjee
    5. MA Nowak

    (2018)
    

    PNAS 115:12241–12246.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810565115
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. Understanding mind and emotion: longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends
    

    1. C Hughes
    2. J Dunn

    (1998)
    

    Developmental Psychology 34:1026–1037.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.1026
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. Social norms and community enforcement
    

    1. M Kandori

    (1992)
    

    The Review of Economic Studies 59:63–80.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/2297925
    

    • Google Scholar
20. The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: genetic and environmental contributions
    

    1. A Knafo
    2. C Zahn-Waxler
    3. C Van Hulle
    4. JL Robinson
    5. SH Rhee

    (2008)
    

    Emotion 8:737–752.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014179
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. Parents' use of inductive discipline: relations to children's empathy and prosocial behavior
    

    1. J Krevans
    2. JC Gibbs

    (1996)
    

    Child Development 67:3263.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131778
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity
    

    1. O Leimar
    2. P Hammerstein

    (2001)
    

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268:745–753.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1573
    

    • Google Scholar
23. Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation
    

    1. N Masuda

    (2012)
    

    Journal of Theoretical Biology 311:8–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.002
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. Egoism, empathy, and self-other merging
    

    1. J May

    (2011)
    

    The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49:25–39.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00055.x
    

    • Google Scholar
25. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation
    

    1. MA Nowak

    (2006)
    

    Science 314:1560–1563.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
    

    1. MA Nowak
    2. K Sigmund

    (1998)
    

    Nature 393:573–577.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/31225
    

    • Google Scholar
27. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games
    

    1. MA Nowak
    2. K Sigmund

    (2004)
    

    Science 303:793–799.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093411
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. Evolution of indirect reciprocity
    

    1. MA Nowak
    2. K Sigmund

    (2005)
    

    Nature 437:1291–1298.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131
    

    • Google Scholar
29. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks
    

    1. H Ohtsuki
    2. C Hauert
    3. E Lieberman
    4. MA Nowak

    (2006)
    

    Nature 441:502–505.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04605
    

    • Google Scholar
30. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment
    

    1. H Ohtsuki
    2. Y Iwasa
    3. MA Nowak

    (2009)
    

    Nature 457:79–82.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07601
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity
    

    1. H Ohtsuki
    2. Y Iwasa

    (2004)
    

    Journal of Theoretical Biology 231:107–120.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.005
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. Tolerant indirect reciprocity can boost social welfare through solidarity with unconditional cooperators in private monitoring
    

    1. I Okada
    2. T Sasaki
    3. Y Nakai

    (2017)
    

    Scientific Reports 7:9737.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09935-2
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. A solution for private assessment in indirect reciprocity using solitary observation
    

    1. I Okada
    2. T Sasaki
    3. Y Nakai

    (2018)
    

    Journal of Theoretical Biology 455:7–15.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.018
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. Stern-Judging: a simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity
    

    1. JM Pacheco
    2. FC Santos
    3. FACC Chalub

    (2006)
    

    PLOS Computational Biology 2:e178.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020178
    

    • Google Scholar
35. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
    

    1. D Premack
    2. G Woodruff

    (1978)
    

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1:515.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
    

    • Google Scholar
36. Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation
    

    1. A Rapoport
    2. AM Chammah
    3. CJ Orwant

    (1965)
    

    University of Michigan Press.

    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.20269
    

    • Google Scholar
37. Evolution of cooperation under indirect reciprocity and arbitrary exploration rates
    

    1. FP Santos
    2. JM Pacheco
    3. FC Santos

    (2016a)
    

    Scientific Reports 6:37517.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37517
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. Social norms of cooperation in Small-Scale societies
    

    1. FP Santos
    2. FC Santos
    3. JM Pacheco

    (2016b)
    

    PLOS Computational Biology 12:e1004709.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004709
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation
    

    1. FP Santos
    2. FC Santos
    3. JM Pacheco

    (2018)
    

    Nature 555:242–245.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25763
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity
    

    1. T Sasaki
    2. I Okada
    3. Y Nakai

    (2017)
    

    Scientific Reports 7:41870.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41870
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy
    

    1. T Singer
    2. E Fehr

    (2005)
    

    American Economic Review 95:340–345.

    https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670103
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution
    

    1. A Smith

    (2006)
    

    The Psychological Record 56:3–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
    

    • Google Scholar
43. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics
    

    1. PD Taylor
    2. LB Jonker

    (1978)
    

    Mathematical Biosciences 40:145–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9
    

    • Google Scholar
44. Pairwise comparison and selection temperature in evolutionary game dynamics
    

    1. A Traulsen
    2. JM Pacheco
    3. MA Nowak

    (2007)
    

    Journal of Theoretical Biology 246:522–529.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.01.002
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. Human strategy updating in evolutionary games
    

    1. A Traulsen
    2. D Semmann
    3. RD Sommerfeld
    4. HJ Krambeck
    5. M Milinski

    (2010)
    

    PNAS 107:2962–2966.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912515107
    

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. A theoretical approach to norm ecosystems: two adaptive architectures of indirect reciprocity show different paths to the evolution of cooperation

    1. S Uchida
    2. H Yamamoto
    3. I Okada
    4. T Sasaki

    (2018)
    

    Frontiers in Physics, 6, 10.3389/fphy.2018.00014.

    • Google Scholar
47. A norm knockout method on indirect reciprocity to reveal indispensable norms
    

    1. H Yamamoto
    2. I Okada
    3. S Uchida
    4. T Sasaki

    (2017)
    

    Scientific Reports 7:44146.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44146
    

    • Google Scholar  
    •  
    • Referencia
      
      Evolution of empathetic moral evaluation. A. L Radzvilavicius et al. eLife, 9 April 2019. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.44269.  
      
      
      https://www.tendencias21.net/La-empatia-se-extiende-naturalmente-en-la-sociedad_a45223.html